NOTICE: This has nothing to do with Trump. He simply exacerbated the underlying issue by adding visibility.
But he lost - in fact, twice. 🤐
This is about the future of the USA.
There have been 4 more controversial🔗 elections in the last 20 years, than in the previous 200 years.
Adding this type of metric is tricky because of the vastly different scales. Obviously, they weren't processing genomes in 1850, but you get the point...😉
☝️ The genome data actually starts in 2001.
So while the cost and sheer ability for counting massively complex things - such as DNA - has improved astronomically...
...disputes related to simply counting votes has increased at a astonishingly similar astronomical rate!
⛔ So... now what?
Clearly our counting prowess has increased astronomically.
So what's wrong?
💡 The security and quality of these voting systems is second rate.
Their administration and oversight is sophomoric.
To sum it up.
How do we know this?
We received and audited a live voting system forensics image. Suffice it to say that the "wasn't connected to the internet" narrative is not only false, but that the system is horribly insecure, allowing vote counts to be remotely altered directly in the database.🤦♀️
For the technical, here is booting the system and remotely logging into SQL Server to alter the vote count. 😢
It's only software.
They'll figure out the bugs.
You know, you're absolutely right.
They will figure it out.🐼
Sharing is Caring 😀